Ayuba Ernest
Banned
In any organization, it is of utmost importance that employees adhere to the set of standards and regulations that have been put in place to ensure the safety of everyone and the quality of the work product. When an employee breaches these standards, it is necessary for the organization to take appropriate action. This could mean anything from a verbal warning to termination.
One question that often arises is what should be the severity of the punishment for a serious infraction. Some people believe that harsher penalties are needed in order to deter employees from breaking the rules, while others feel that more lenient punishments are more effective in achieving compliance.
When an employee commits a serious work infraction, such as drinking on the job, sexual harassment, or violence in the workplace, is it more effective to penalize the employee through disciplinary action or termination? This is a question that has been debated for many years, with no clear consensus. Some people argue that termination is the only way to ensure that the behavior will not be repeated, while others believe that disciplinary action is a more effective deterrent.
One question that often arises is what should be the severity of the punishment for a serious infraction. Some people believe that harsher penalties are needed in order to deter employees from breaking the rules, while others feel that more lenient punishments are more effective in achieving compliance.
When an employee commits a serious work infraction, such as drinking on the job, sexual harassment, or violence in the workplace, is it more effective to penalize the employee through disciplinary action or termination? This is a question that has been debated for many years, with no clear consensus. Some people argue that termination is the only way to ensure that the behavior will not be repeated, while others believe that disciplinary action is a more effective deterrent.