Should gender come to play when assigning task to employees.

[CALVINDOL]

A business organisation is understood to constitute male and female employees or subordinates as well as male and female employers or superiors. However in a business organisation appointment and re-appointment is absolutely done possibly in the case of choosing business managers or assigning directives to specific assignments. Most business operations and managers tend to favour male employees than to female employees, and this is due to the mind-set that male employees are definitely very confident and most importantly very accurate in performing any activity or task being assigned to them. In my own view and perspective I do not believe that this is entirely true, as the ability for an individual to perform very correctly and very benevolently in a particular task or duty totally depends on his or her qualifications as well as creativity in deducing what he or she should do or should not do in order to make perfection in the given assignment or task.

Gender can never come to play when a particular assigned task is based on qualification. Moreover, male and female employees are capable and suitable to perform all type of task and duties based on their qualification. Female employees on the other hand, are also effective in performing any activity being assigned to them only if they are qualified. In conclusion, a business manager or business owner shouldn't assign task to employee which gender difference in his or her mind. But what should be the main course of task assigning is qualification and creativity.

 

[Jasz]

In an organization that is increasingly run by technology, there are many tasks that need to be performed. These tasks are assigned to employees. Should gender come into play when assigning task to employees?

If you ask me, yes! Gender comes into play when assigning task to employees because it is important for the organization to know whether they have enough female workers or not. If there are too many male workers and not enough female workers, then the company would have a shortage of female workers compared to male workers. This can lead to various issues such as discrimination against female workers or other issues such as companies having less flexibility with hiring female employees because they have too many male workers already.

In conclusion, gender should be considered when assigning task to employees because it impacts how efficient your organization will run as well as how efficient you'll be able to make decisions based on what type of worker best suits your needs at that time. When it comes to qualification, however this looks awkward.

 

[Holicent]

The gender pay gap is a significant problem. It's been going on for decades and it's not getting any better. The gap exists in both the private and public sector, but it's especially bad in the private sector where one gender continue to be paid less their counterparts.

While it's true that there are many factors that contribute to this pay gap, one of them should come as no surprise: men are assigned very difficult tasks compared to women. Women, who make up more than two-thirds of the American workforce, are paid less than men. In fact, they're paid 22% less on average.

The gender pay gap has been documented for decades and it's not getting any easier to solve. For example, women are typically underrepresented in leadership positions where pay is higher and promotions are more likely to be made based on performance rather than seniority or experience alone.

One way employers can address this issue is by increasing opportunities for women in their organizations so they can compete for promotions that lead to higher compensation levels. But should gender come into play when assigning tasks? Nevertheless we have seen cases where women are paid higher for the same position and they are opened to more opportunities than men.