Etini
Valued Contributor
Before you start calling me insensitive for asking that question, I have seen so many families in my country that were financially comfortable being rendered completely broke because they spent all they had on medical bills for family member that was critically sick. The irony is that most of the times, the sick family member eventually dies. This has killed the wealth potential of so many young people in my African society. Maybe, other parts of the world too.
But the family remains broke having exhausted all their funds trying to save the family person from dying.
Do you think that with such a family member that the chances of survival is very low, they should just be allowed to die rather than spend so much money and the person still dies at the end. What's your take on this?
But the family remains broke having exhausted all their funds trying to save the family person from dying.
Do you think that with such a family member that the chances of survival is very low, they should just be allowed to die rather than spend so much money and the person still dies at the end. What's your take on this?