Etini
Valued Contributor
Most small and medium businesses have managers that help to run the day-to-day operation of the business. In some businesses, these managers are allowed complete freedom to make decisions about the business without interference from the owners of the business. Is it the right approach to allow the managers of a business complete autonomy?
I think it is the best thing for business managers to have complete autonomy because it helps to bring out their creativity in them. This is especially true when you have young and vibrant managers that have fresh ideas and innovations to bring to the organization.
On the other hand, you don't hand over everything to the managers till it gets to the point of it looking like negligence. As the business owner, you need to supervise but not interfere. You only come in when it seems the management are going in the wrong direction and oace. What do you think? Should business owners still be putting stringent hands on a business even when they have competent managers?
I think it is the best thing for business managers to have complete autonomy because it helps to bring out their creativity in them. This is especially true when you have young and vibrant managers that have fresh ideas and innovations to bring to the organization.
On the other hand, you don't hand over everything to the managers till it gets to the point of it looking like negligence. As the business owner, you need to supervise but not interfere. You only come in when it seems the management are going in the wrong direction and oace. What do you think? Should business owners still be putting stringent hands on a business even when they have competent managers?